NHL News article THE NHL can go back, but it will have to reinvent itself.
The league has to reinvent its brand and identity, and the NHL can do so by adopting a more nuanced and sophisticated approach to how it does business, according to executives and former players.
In the coming weeks, the league will be meeting with some of its biggest business partners, and there will be a series of meetings and events to figure out the next steps.
The NHL needs to make the most of the time it has left to try to revitalize itself.
The NHL has been struggling for years with how to keep its players happy and engaged.
There are two sides to the coin: the players want to see a full season of games, but they also want to make sure their salaries are not impacted, and they want to have a competitive product that appeals to fans.
The owners, however, are not happy with the current state of the league, which is hurting attendance and attendance-to-seat ratios.
They have to decide whether they want the NHL to be a team-based league, or a business-as-usual league.
If they are going to try something different, then it will require them to rethink the franchise and player relationship.
They will also need to figure how they want this league to operate.
How will the league decide which franchises are “good” and which are not?
How will it determine whether the league can become a “good enough” team to compete in the NHL?
And, of course, there is the question of whether the players will be allowed to work for the NHL again.
Some of them have been fired from the league for being too outspoken and disrespectful, and others have been fined or suspended for being on the wrong side of the game.
But it will be hard for them to find another job in the league if the owners decide to terminate them.
A full season for the current team-only league would take about two years, the owners said.
So the league would need to change its brand in the same way that it did in 1996 when it rebranded the NHL from a professional league to an amateur league, then a major league.
But that would require a new set of rules and a new business model.
It would require some changes to the way players are paid and how the league handles player injuries.
And, as the players themselves said during a recent radio appearance, they have no intention of accepting such a change.
They want to continue to play.
The most important thing is the players and the fans, and to me, they are a key to that.
The owners also want the league to make changes to its television contract, and it is a critical issue for the league.
There is a big gap between what is being broadcast on television and what is happening on the ice, and many people believe that the NHL should be able to broadcast a game at any time of day and anywhere in the world, including in places that are not the most popular places to play, such as Canada, Europe and Latin America.
The players, however are against that idea.
The league will have a lot to consider in the coming months, and some executives and players believe that if the NHL continues to operate as it is now, then the owners may not have the money to do any major changes.
There are some teams that have tried to change the NHL brand over the years.
For instance, the Tampa Bay Lightning used to be known as the “Lightning Lightning.”
It has changed its name to the Tampa St. Lucie Lightning, and has been trying to get its players to join the league this season.
But most fans and teams are still loyal to the Lightning, who are still known as “the Lightning.”
There is even talk of a new team being named after Lightning legend Vinny Lecavalier.
The current NHL, however in the short-term, is not going to be able do much to change things for the players.
The existing ownership structure of the owners has been very good for them, and when they were in their heyday, they were able to make money.
But those days are long gone.
The way things are right now, it will take some time to convince the owners that the best way to grow the league is to do a complete revamp.
And the players may be the ones that are more interested in changing things than the owners.
They will have more control over what happens in the locker room, the dressing room and the dressing-room media.
They may have more power to say when the next team needs to be hired, whether the team is going to play in their city or not.
They may be able, in turn, to force the owners to change their ways.
They have a better relationship with the players, and that will be the best avenue for change.